https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290310 An amendment to a plaint schedule to include additional partition property should ordinarily be allowed where the property is admitted to be available for partition, the amendment does not change the nature of the suit, and it helps achieve complete adjudication without fresh contentious issues. Mere delay is not, by itself, a sufficient ground to refuse such relief, especially where the delay is explained and rejection would prolong or multiply litigation. On those facts, refusal of the amendment solely for delay was unsustainable, and the application ought to have been allowed. en-us Mon, 26 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Sep 2020 10:26:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290310 An amendment to a plaint schedule to include additional partition property should ordinarily be allowed where the property is admitted to be available for partition, the amendment does not change the nature of the suit, and it helps achieve complete adjudication without fresh contentious issues. Mere delay is not, by itself, a sufficient ground to refuse such relief, especially where the delay is explained and rejection would prolong or multiply litigation. On those facts, refusal of the amendment solely for delay was unsustainable, and the application ought to have been allowed. Case-Laws Benami Property Mon, 26 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290310