<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 668 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398549</link>
    <description>Payments to a non-resident for liaison, procurement of orders and incidental reimbursement were treated as commission-related outgoings, not fees for technical, managerial or consultancy services. Although the agreement and invoices used consulting-style descriptions, the actual work was limited to interfacing and order procurement, and the non-resident certified that no technical or managerial services were rendered. On those facts, the sums were not chargeable to tax in India in the absence of a permanent establishment or business connection, so tax deduction at source under section 195 did not arise. The demand under section 201 and interest under section 201(1A) were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:54:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 668 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398549</link>
      <description>Payments to a non-resident for liaison, procurement of orders and incidental reimbursement were treated as commission-related outgoings, not fees for technical, managerial or consultancy services. Although the agreement and invoices used consulting-style descriptions, the actual work was limited to interfacing and order procurement, and the non-resident certified that no technical or managerial services were rendered. On those facts, the sums were not chargeable to tax in India in the absence of a permanent establishment or business connection, so tax deduction at source under section 195 did not arise. The demand under section 201 and interest under section 201(1A) were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>