<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 666 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398547</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, ruling in favor of the assessee on all issues. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, except for remitting the Section 14A disallowance back to the AO for quantification. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, while the cross-objection was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 666 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398547</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, ruling in favor of the assessee on all issues. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, except for remitting the Section 14A disallowance back to the AO for quantification. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, while the cross-objection was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>