<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 662 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398543</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, correcting the indexation cost computation by considering the year of acquisition instead of the year of gift, partially allowing the claimed commission expenditure, and rejecting the new plea for deduction under section 54 due to lack of prior presentation before lower authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 662 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398543</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, correcting the indexation cost computation by considering the year of acquisition instead of the year of gift, partially allowing the claimed commission expenditure, and rejecting the new plea for deduction under section 54 due to lack of prior presentation before lower authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>