<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 661 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398542</link>
    <description>Declared transaction value for imported second-hand digital multifunctional devices cannot be discarded and replaced with a Chartered Engineer&#039;s estimate unless the customs officer first forms a legally sustainable doubt and follows the prescribed valuation process. On the facts, that process was not undertaken, so the enhanced valuation was set aside and the declared value restored for assessment. The goods were, however, treated as restricted imports imported without the required DGFT authorisation; environmental clearance did not substitute for that licence, so confiscation was sustained. The redemption fine and penalty were reduced in light of proportional treatment applied in similar second-hand goods matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2021 15:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 661 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398542</link>
      <description>Declared transaction value for imported second-hand digital multifunctional devices cannot be discarded and replaced with a Chartered Engineer&#039;s estimate unless the customs officer first forms a legally sustainable doubt and follows the prescribed valuation process. On the facts, that process was not undertaken, so the enhanced valuation was set aside and the declared value restored for assessment. The goods were, however, treated as restricted imports imported without the required DGFT authorisation; environmental clearance did not substitute for that licence, so confiscation was sustained. The redemption fine and penalty were reduced in light of proportional treatment applied in similar second-hand goods matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>