<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 661 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398542</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reinstating the declared transaction value for assessment. Goods were confiscated due to the absence of a specific import license, upheld under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act. Redemption fine and penalty were reduced to 10% and 5% of the assessable value, respectively, emphasizing proportionality. Appellant received consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2021 15:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 661 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398542</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reinstating the declared transaction value for assessment. Goods were confiscated due to the absence of a specific import license, upheld under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act. Redemption fine and penalty were reduced to 10% and 5% of the assessable value, respectively, emphasizing proportionality. Appellant received consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>