<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 660 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398541</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, finding that the appellant was entitled to the benefit of exemption Notification No. 53/97-Cus for clearing the DG Sets to EPCG License holders at a concessional rate of duty. The Tribunal emphasized the compliance with conditions and lack of contrary evidence from the Revenue, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:05:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 660 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398541</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, finding that the appellant was entitled to the benefit of exemption Notification No. 53/97-Cus for clearing the DG Sets to EPCG License holders at a concessional rate of duty. The Tribunal emphasized the compliance with conditions and lack of contrary evidence from the Revenue, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>