https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398530 The appeal was dismissed due to the rejection of the delay condonation application, which lacked substantial details and supporting documents. The Appellant failed to rectify defects communicated by the Registry and did not appear to press the condonation application, leading to dismissal. The Tribunal found the reasons for delay insufficient and not supported by evidence, ultimately resulting in the rejection of the condonation application and the dismissal of the appeal. The case underscores the necessity of providing specific reasons and adequate documentation when seeking condonation of delay in legal matters. en-us Tue, 03 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:32:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398530 The appeal was dismissed due to the rejection of the delay condonation application, which lacked substantial details and supporting documents. The Appellant failed to rectify defects communicated by the Registry and did not appear to press the condonation application, leading to dismissal. The Tribunal found the reasons for delay insufficient and not supported by evidence, ultimately resulting in the rejection of the condonation application and the dismissal of the appeal. The case underscores the necessity of providing specific reasons and adequate documentation when seeking condonation of delay in legal matters. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 03 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398530