https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398527 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, determining that there was no suppression of material facts as the Assessee had followed the Department's advice on the valuation method for transferred goods. Consequently, the extended period of limitation under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act was deemed inapplicable, emphasizing the significance of adhering to official instructions to avoid adverse consequences. en-us Wed, 09 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Feb 2021 11:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398527 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, determining that there was no suppression of material facts as the Assessee had followed the Department's advice on the valuation method for transferred goods. Consequently, the extended period of limitation under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act was deemed inapplicable, emphasizing the significance of adhering to official instructions to avoid adverse consequences. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 09 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398527