<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 645 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398526</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the majority of the demand based on computer printouts, confirming only a small demand of Rs. 58,302/- based on physical evidence (dispatch slips and delivery challans). The penalties on directors and co-noticees were also set aside, and the appeal of M/s. Wilson Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd. was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:14:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 645 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398526</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the majority of the demand based on computer printouts, confirming only a small demand of Rs. 58,302/- based on physical evidence (dispatch slips and delivery challans). The penalties on directors and co-noticees were also set aside, and the appeal of M/s. Wilson Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd. was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>