<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 24 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23258</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the assessee qualified as an industrial company under section 2(7)(c) of the Finance Act, 1981, based on the use of computers in their consultancy services. Consequently, the assessee was deemed eligible for investment allowance for a generator installation. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, affirming both issues in favor of the assessee. Justice SUHAS CHANDRA SEN concurred with the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 24 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23258</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the assessee qualified as an industrial company under section 2(7)(c) of the Finance Act, 1981, based on the use of computers in their consultancy services. Consequently, the assessee was deemed eligible for investment allowance for a generator installation. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, affirming both issues in favor of the assessee. Justice SUHAS CHANDRA SEN concurred with the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>