https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398519 The plaintiff's claim was dismissed as the defendant successfully rebutted the presumption of the cheque's validity under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to discrepancies and manipulations in the cheque. However, the suit was deemed maintainable under the H.P. Registration of Money Lenders Act as the defendant failed to prove the plaintiff was a 'moneylender.' The lower courts' findings were upheld, concluding that the plaintiff did not prove the loan transaction, leading to the dismissal of the suit. en-us Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:33:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398519 The plaintiff's claim was dismissed as the defendant successfully rebutted the presumption of the cheque's validity under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to discrepancies and manipulations in the cheque. However, the suit was deemed maintainable under the H.P. Registration of Money Lenders Act as the defendant failed to prove the plaintiff was a 'moneylender.' The lower courts' findings were upheld, concluding that the plaintiff did not prove the loan transaction, leading to the dismissal of the suit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398519