https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398517 The court upheld the trial court's decision to dismiss the petitioner's application under Section 311 Cr.P.C., deeming it a delay tactic. The petitioner's plea for further cross-examination of the complainant was rejected, with the court emphasizing the need for expedited proceedings after five years of pending litigation. The court dismissed the petition, instructing the trial court to hasten the trial process and allowing only one opportunity for oral arguments, with written submissions due by 10.09.2020. en-us Tue, 08 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:27:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398517 The court upheld the trial court's decision to dismiss the petitioner's application under Section 311 Cr.P.C., deeming it a delay tactic. The petitioner's plea for further cross-examination of the complainant was rejected, with the court emphasizing the need for expedited proceedings after five years of pending litigation. The court dismissed the petition, instructing the trial court to hasten the trial process and allowing only one opportunity for oral arguments, with written submissions due by 10.09.2020. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398517