https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398517 A recall application under Section 311 CrPC for further cross-examination of the complainant was declined because it was moved at a belated stage and did not identify any specific document or issue requiring further questioning. The defence had already cross-examined the complainant, and its own witnesses had been confronted with the material relied upon. Section 311 cannot be used to fill lacunae in the defence or delay the trial, particularly where no real prejudice was shown and the proposed material had no bearing on the merits of the complaint. The recall request was refused and the petition dismissed. en-us Tue, 08 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:27:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398517 A recall application under Section 311 CrPC for further cross-examination of the complainant was declined because it was moved at a belated stage and did not identify any specific document or issue requiring further questioning. The defence had already cross-examined the complainant, and its own witnesses had been confronted with the material relied upon. Section 311 cannot be used to fill lacunae in the defence or delay the trial, particularly where no real prejudice was shown and the proposed material had no bearing on the merits of the complaint. The recall request was refused and the petition dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398517