https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290303 The High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal regarding the interpretation of Rule 89(2) of Order 21 of the CPC, 1908. The dispute arose from the sale of properties under a decree, with respondent No. 1 filing applications under Rule 90 and Rule 89. The Court upheld the validity of respondent No. 1's application under Rule 89, emphasizing the importance of procedural requirements and denying the appellant's challenge on the sufficiency of the deposited amount. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower courts' decision to allow respondent No. 1's application under Rule 89 and preserve their property rights. en-us Wed, 12 Feb 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:11:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290303 The High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal regarding the interpretation of Rule 89(2) of Order 21 of the CPC, 1908. The dispute arose from the sale of properties under a decree, with respondent No. 1 filing applications under Rule 90 and Rule 89. The Court upheld the validity of respondent No. 1's application under Rule 89, emphasizing the importance of procedural requirements and denying the appellant's challenge on the sufficiency of the deposited amount. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower courts' decision to allow respondent No. 1's application under Rule 89 and preserve their property rights. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 Feb 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290303