https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290302 The court allowed the withdrawal of a suit against one defendant despite opposition from another defendant. The judgment emphasized that a plaintiff has an unconditional right to withdraw a suit without requiring formal court permission, as per Order XXIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Once a plaintiff files a purshis of withdrawal, the withdrawal is effective, and the court only needs to record it formally. The court clarified that refusal to allow withdrawal based on a defendant's status as a necessary party is erroneous. The trial court's decision was set aside, and the withdrawal was deemed complete upon filing the purshis. en-us Fri, 10 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:06:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290302 The court allowed the withdrawal of a suit against one defendant despite opposition from another defendant. The judgment emphasized that a plaintiff has an unconditional right to withdraw a suit without requiring formal court permission, as per Order XXIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Once a plaintiff files a purshis of withdrawal, the withdrawal is effective, and the court only needs to record it formally. The court clarified that refusal to allow withdrawal based on a defendant's status as a necessary party is erroneous. The trial court's decision was set aside, and the withdrawal was deemed complete upon filing the purshis. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290302