https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290301 The appeal challenging a learned single Judge's order was dismissed as the writ petition was found to be barred by the rule of constructive res judicata and inordinate delay. The appellants had withdrawn a previous writ petition on the same matter before a decision on merits, and the current petition, filed after a significant delay, was deemed impermissible under Rule 382 of the Rajasthan High Court Rules. The Court emphasized the principle of laches due to the unreasonable delay and the discretionary nature of relief under Article 226, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal with costs. en-us Thu, 16 Sep 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:02:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290301 The appeal challenging a learned single Judge's order was dismissed as the writ petition was found to be barred by the rule of constructive res judicata and inordinate delay. The appellants had withdrawn a previous writ petition on the same matter before a decision on merits, and the current petition, filed after a significant delay, was deemed impermissible under Rule 382 of the Rajasthan High Court Rules. The Court emphasized the principle of laches due to the unreasonable delay and the discretionary nature of relief under Article 226, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Sep 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290301