<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1830 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290291</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal against the Ld. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) order for AY 2009-10, reducing the addition of income from alleged bogus purchases. The reassessment proceedings were deemed valid, with the Tribunal lowering the estimated profit element from the disputed purchases due to lack of conclusive proof. The AO was directed to recalculate the appellant&#039;s income based on the revised profit estimation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:54:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1830 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290291</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal against the Ld. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) order for AY 2009-10, reducing the addition of income from alleged bogus purchases. The reassessment proceedings were deemed valid, with the Tribunal lowering the estimated profit element from the disputed purchases due to lack of conclusive proof. The AO was directed to recalculate the appellant&#039;s income based on the revised profit estimation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>