<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (12) TMI 26 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23254</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction of business loss for imported electrical spare parts not taken delivery of. The decision not to clear the consignment was deemed a valid business choice, and the authorities lacked justification to challenge it. Consequently, the court answered both questions negatively, supporting the assessee&#039;s claim for the deduction of business loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:44:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (12) TMI 26 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23254</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction of business loss for imported electrical spare parts not taken delivery of. The decision not to clear the consignment was deemed a valid business choice, and the authorities lacked justification to challenge it. Consequently, the court answered both questions negatively, supporting the assessee&#039;s claim for the deduction of business loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>