<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 606 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398487</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 114 of the Customs Act, as there was no evidence of an attempt to export the red sanders. The confiscation of goods and cash was deemed unsustainable, leading to the annulment of the penalty. The appellant&#039;s role as an interpreter and lack of concrete evidence of involvement in smuggling activities resulted in the appeal being allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:20:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 606 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398487</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 114 of the Customs Act, as there was no evidence of an attempt to export the red sanders. The confiscation of goods and cash was deemed unsustainable, leading to the annulment of the penalty. The appellant&#039;s role as an interpreter and lack of concrete evidence of involvement in smuggling activities resulted in the appeal being allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>