https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398478 Where a company petition was earlier disposed of only because a connected insolvency proceeding was pending, the tribunal restored the petition once that basis no longer existed, so the matter could be heard on merits and procedure would not defeat substantive rights. It also held that allegations of forgery, perjury and the related request for criminal prosecution arising from verification affidavits lie outside its jurisdiction, because such issues must be decided by the competent criminal court or investigating authority. The petition was therefore restored to file, while the ancillary allegations were left to the proper forum. en-us Mon, 08 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Sep 2020 14:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398478 Where a company petition was earlier disposed of only because a connected insolvency proceeding was pending, the tribunal restored the petition once that basis no longer existed, so the matter could be heard on merits and procedure would not defeat substantive rights. It also held that allegations of forgery, perjury and the related request for criminal prosecution arising from verification affidavits lie outside its jurisdiction, because such issues must be decided by the competent criminal court or investigating authority. The petition was therefore restored to file, while the ancillary allegations were left to the proper forum. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 08 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398478