<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 595 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398476</link>
    <description>A continuing commercial arrangement was governed by purchase orders and a later comprehensive agreement containing a separate ICC arbitration clause. Applying harmonious construction, the SC held that disputes concerning pricing, payment, deductions and recovery fell within the later agreement because it dealt specifically with those matters and the broader contractual framework. Since arbitration had already been invoked under that agreement and an arbitral tribunal had been constituted, a fresh appointment under the purchase orders was not maintainable. The challenge to the existing tribunal also failed, as the later agreement&#039;s arbitration mechanism governed the dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2020 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 595 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398476</link>
      <description>A continuing commercial arrangement was governed by purchase orders and a later comprehensive agreement containing a separate ICC arbitration clause. Applying harmonious construction, the SC held that disputes concerning pricing, payment, deductions and recovery fell within the later agreement because it dealt specifically with those matters and the broader contractual framework. Since arbitration had already been invoked under that agreement and an arbitral tribunal had been constituted, a fresh appointment under the purchase orders was not maintainable. The challenge to the existing tribunal also failed, as the later agreement&#039;s arbitration mechanism governed the dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>