https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398473 The Court upheld the First Appellate Court's decision in an appeal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused successfully rebutted the presumption of liability by challenging the existence of a legally enforceable debt through legal notices and cross-examination. The Court found the complainant's evidence lacking, particularly in substantiating the debt claimed, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without costs. The judgment underscored the necessity of proving a valid debt to support cases under Section 138 and the importance of providing concrete evidence in such proceedings. en-us Mon, 03 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Sep 2020 14:43:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398473 The Court upheld the First Appellate Court's decision in an appeal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused successfully rebutted the presumption of liability by challenging the existence of a legally enforceable debt through legal notices and cross-examination. The Court found the complainant's evidence lacking, particularly in substantiating the debt claimed, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without costs. The judgment underscored the necessity of proving a valid debt to support cases under Section 138 and the importance of providing concrete evidence in such proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398473