<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1361 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290269</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both the assessee&#039;s and the Revenue&#039;s appeals. It upheld the Revenue&#039;s method of computing disallowance under Section 14A but directed verification of the assessee&#039;s claims regarding interest on business loans. For the deemed dividend issue, it remanded the matter to the AO for a detailed factual examination to determine the nature of the transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2020 10:19:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1361 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290269</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both the assessee&#039;s and the Revenue&#039;s appeals. It upheld the Revenue&#039;s method of computing disallowance under Section 14A but directed verification of the assessee&#039;s claims regarding interest on business loans. For the deemed dividend issue, it remanded the matter to the AO for a detailed factual examination to determine the nature of the transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>