<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1923 (11) TMI 1 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290266</link>
    <description>The pre-emption statute&#039;s definition of agricultural land was read together with the definition of land in the Punjab Alienation of Land Act, 1900. Applying those definitions to the facts, the tea garden property was treated as falling within the statutory meaning of agricultural land. As both lower courts had reached that conclusion, the Privy Council found no basis to interfere and upheld the determination that the property was agricultural land for pre-emption purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 1923 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 15:16:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1923 (11) TMI 1 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290266</link>
      <description>The pre-emption statute&#039;s definition of agricultural land was read together with the definition of land in the Punjab Alienation of Land Act, 1900. Applying those definitions to the facts, the tea garden property was treated as falling within the statutory meaning of agricultural land. As both lower courts had reached that conclusion, the Privy Council found no basis to interfere and upheld the determination that the property was agricultural land for pre-emption purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 1923 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>