<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 584 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398465</link>
    <description>The High Court disposed of the writ petitions, allowing petitioners to seek recommendations from the GST Council through the Standing Counsel for availing benefits within the specified deadline. Challenges to the constitutional validity of Rule 117 were not entertained based on previous judgments, but petitioners were granted the opportunity to pursue their claims through the prescribed procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 584 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398465</link>
      <description>The High Court disposed of the writ petitions, allowing petitioners to seek recommendations from the GST Council through the Standing Counsel for availing benefits within the specified deadline. Challenges to the constitutional validity of Rule 117 were not entertained based on previous judgments, but petitioners were granted the opportunity to pursue their claims through the prescribed procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>