<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 577 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398458</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part. The addition of Rs. 3,51,470/- for unaccounted cash was deleted, as the cash found was reconciled with the books of accounts and did not belong to the assessee. However, the addition of Rs. 18,315/- for disallowance of interest on late TDS deposit was upheld, following precedent that such interest is not a deductible business expenditure. The order was pronounced on 01/09/2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 577 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398458</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part. The addition of Rs. 3,51,470/- for unaccounted cash was deleted, as the cash found was reconciled with the books of accounts and did not belong to the assessee. However, the addition of Rs. 18,315/- for disallowance of interest on late TDS deposit was upheld, following precedent that such interest is not a deductible business expenditure. The order was pronounced on 01/09/2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>