<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 566 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398447</link>
    <description>The ITAT Jaipur allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under Explanation 5A to Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the absence of incriminating material during the search, the bonafide nature of the mistake, and the strict interpretation of penalty provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:09:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 566 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398447</link>
      <description>The ITAT Jaipur allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under Explanation 5A to Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the absence of incriminating material during the search, the bonafide nature of the mistake, and the strict interpretation of penalty provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>