<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 562 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398443</link>
    <description>The Court found the freezing of the petitioner&#039;s bank account unjustified and oppressive as it was done without legal sanction under section 110(5) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court noted the account was frozen before the provision&#039;s effective date and that the initial freezing period had expired. Consequently, the Court directed the immediate unfreezing of the account, emphasizing that the freeze was not in accordance with the law. The writ petition was allowed without costs, and the order was to be digitally signed for prompt implementation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2021 17:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 562 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398443</link>
      <description>The Court found the freezing of the petitioner&#039;s bank account unjustified and oppressive as it was done without legal sanction under section 110(5) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court noted the account was frozen before the provision&#039;s effective date and that the initial freezing period had expired. Consequently, the Court directed the immediate unfreezing of the account, emphasizing that the freeze was not in accordance with the law. The writ petition was allowed without costs, and the order was to be digitally signed for prompt implementation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>