https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290245 The Tribunal dismissed all appeals filed by the assessee against orders of the CIT(A) sustaining penalties under section 234E of the Act due to a delay of 546 days in filing the appeals. The Tribunal found the reasons provided by the assessee, citing health problems, lacked supporting medical evidence or affidavits. Emphasizing the need for diligence and absence of negligence in condoning delays, the Tribunal ruled that the appeals were dismissed as barred by limitation. The judgment underscored the importance of providing valid justifications and evidence to avoid adverse outcomes in legal proceedings. en-us Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:09:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290245 The Tribunal dismissed all appeals filed by the assessee against orders of the CIT(A) sustaining penalties under section 234E of the Act due to a delay of 546 days in filing the appeals. The Tribunal found the reasons provided by the assessee, citing health problems, lacked supporting medical evidence or affidavits. Emphasizing the need for diligence and absence of negligence in condoning delays, the Tribunal ruled that the appeals were dismissed as barred by limitation. The judgment underscored the importance of providing valid justifications and evidence to avoid adverse outcomes in legal proceedings. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290245