<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 1044 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290241</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, applying the Doctrine of supervening impossibility to excuse the delay in investing in REC bonds beyond the statutory limit under sec.54EC. Despite the technical non-compliance, the Tribunal considered the senior citizen assessee&#039;s health issues post-sale, deeming the 59-day delay reasonable. It directed the assessing authority to grant the exemption under sec.54EC, ordering a refund if applicable within 45 days. The decision highlights the significance of assessing cases on a case-by-case basis and applying legal principles sensibly, even in instances of statutory timeframe breaches.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:09:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 1044 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290241</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, applying the Doctrine of supervening impossibility to excuse the delay in investing in REC bonds beyond the statutory limit under sec.54EC. Despite the technical non-compliance, the Tribunal considered the senior citizen assessee&#039;s health issues post-sale, deeming the 59-day delay reasonable. It directed the assessing authority to grant the exemption under sec.54EC, ordering a refund if applicable within 45 days. The decision highlights the significance of assessing cases on a case-by-case basis and applying legal principles sensibly, even in instances of statutory timeframe breaches.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>