<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Applicant / corporate creditor to pay fees of IRP/ RP – NCALT order holding debtor to pay fees reversed – quality of NCLT/ NCALT teams need improvement.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9469</link>
    <description>The insolvency expense-allocation framework requires the applicant to bear expenses incurred by the Interim Resolution Professional, subject to reimbursement by a Committee of Creditors to the extent ratified; absent a constituted committee the applicant remains liable. A tribunal order directing the corporate debtor to pay IRP fees applied general court-costs reasoning that conflicted with these specific insolvency provisions. Procedural shortcomings included lack of opportunity for the debtor to be heard and indicators of hasty tribunal decision-making, underscoring a need to improve tribunal team quality and procedural adherence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:08:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:08:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Applicant / corporate creditor to pay fees of IRP/ RP – NCALT order holding debtor to pay fees reversed – quality of NCLT/ NCALT teams need improvement.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9469</link>
      <description>The insolvency expense-allocation framework requires the applicant to bear expenses incurred by the Interim Resolution Professional, subject to reimbursement by a Committee of Creditors to the extent ratified; absent a constituted committee the applicant remains liable. A tribunal order directing the corporate debtor to pay IRP fees applied general court-costs reasoning that conflicted with these specific insolvency provisions. Procedural shortcomings included lack of opportunity for the debtor to be heard and indicators of hasty tribunal decision-making, underscoring a need to improve tribunal team quality and procedural adherence.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Corporate Laws / IBC / SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:08:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>