<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1933 (8) TMI 6 - Calcutta High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290234</link>
    <description>The court held that the notice under Section 34 of the Indian Income Tax Act was not valid as it was not served within the period of limitation allowed by the section. The court concluded that the notice served on the assesses was not valid, and the reference was answered in favor of the assessees, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 1933 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 14:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1933 (8) TMI 6 - Calcutta High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290234</link>
      <description>The court held that the notice under Section 34 of the Indian Income Tax Act was not valid as it was not served within the period of limitation allowed by the section. The court concluded that the notice served on the assesses was not valid, and the reference was answered in favor of the assessees, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 1933 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>