<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 542 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398423</link>
    <description>A transfer of an undertaking under a court-approved scheme of arrangement, satisfied only by allotment of equity shares and not by monetary consideration, was not a slump sale under Section 2(42C) read with Section 50B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that a sale for Section 50B requires a lump sum monetary price, whereas a share-based transfer may amount to an exchange and cannot be treated as a contractual sale merely because the scheme used the word &quot;consideration.&quot; It also held that there is no estoppel in tax law, so the assessee could raise the pure legal plea at the appellate stage. The appeal succeeded and the slump sale assessment was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 16:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 542 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398423</link>
      <description>A transfer of an undertaking under a court-approved scheme of arrangement, satisfied only by allotment of equity shares and not by monetary consideration, was not a slump sale under Section 2(42C) read with Section 50B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that a sale for Section 50B requires a lump sum monetary price, whereas a share-based transfer may amount to an exchange and cannot be treated as a contractual sale merely because the scheme used the word &quot;consideration.&quot; It also held that there is no estoppel in tax law, so the assessee could raise the pure legal plea at the appellate stage. The appeal succeeded and the slump sale assessment was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>