<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 537 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398418</link>
    <description>The appeal against the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was disposed of, remanding the matter back to the CIT(A) for reevaluation. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) did not adequately address the assessee&#039;s contentions and directed the assessee to appear before the CIT(A) with supporting evidence. The decision allowed for the submission of necessary information and documentation, ensuring a fair consideration of the assessee&#039;s arguments. The remand did not prejudice the assessee&#039;s right to opt for the settlement scheme, providing an opportunity for further examination and resolution of the penalty issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:36:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 537 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398418</link>
      <description>The appeal against the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was disposed of, remanding the matter back to the CIT(A) for reevaluation. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) did not adequately address the assessee&#039;s contentions and directed the assessee to appear before the CIT(A) with supporting evidence. The decision allowed for the submission of necessary information and documentation, ensuring a fair consideration of the assessee&#039;s arguments. The remand did not prejudice the assessee&#039;s right to opt for the settlement scheme, providing an opportunity for further examination and resolution of the penalty issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>