<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 536 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398417</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed with the delay in filing the appeal condoned. The addition of Rs. 5,05,050/- was modified to only consider 8% of the amount as income. Additionally, the addition of Rs. 3 lakhs as unexplained income was deleted, emphasizing that under Section 44AD, further additions based on unexplained deposits are not warranted. The court&#039;s decision was pronounced on 11th September 2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2020 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 536 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398417</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed with the delay in filing the appeal condoned. The addition of Rs. 5,05,050/- was modified to only consider 8% of the amount as income. Additionally, the addition of Rs. 3 lakhs as unexplained income was deleted, emphasizing that under Section 44AD, further additions based on unexplained deposits are not warranted. The court&#039;s decision was pronounced on 11th September 2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>