<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1938 (11) TMI 27 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290231</link>
    <description>Profits from the first six loan items were treated as attributable to the non-resident bank through a business connection in British India under Section 42(1), because the resident bank and non-resident bank were effectively controlled by the same family, the resident bank was substantially financed by the non-resident bank, and the lending arrangement was continuous rather than isolated. The Court stated that a business connection need not arise from contracts made in British India and may be inferred from a continuing course of dealings and practical control over the flow of business. The Bentong office was only a nominal conduit, so the income was regarded as accruing or arising through that business connection and assessment through the resident bank as agent was valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 1938 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:19:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1938 (11) TMI 27 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290231</link>
      <description>Profits from the first six loan items were treated as attributable to the non-resident bank through a business connection in British India under Section 42(1), because the resident bank and non-resident bank were effectively controlled by the same family, the resident bank was substantially financed by the non-resident bank, and the lending arrangement was continuous rather than isolated. The Court stated that a business connection need not arise from contracts made in British India and may be inferred from a continuing course of dealings and practical control over the flow of business. The Bentong office was only a nominal conduit, so the income was regarded as accruing or arising through that business connection and assessment through the resident bank as agent was valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 1938 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>