<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 532 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398413</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the penalty proceedings initiated under Section 271AAB due to defective notices issued under Section 274 r.w.s. 271AAB, which did not specify the charges and clauses under which the penalty was levied. The penalties sustained by the CIT(A) were deleted, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, as the Tribunal upheld the relief granted by the CIT(A) on the grounds of defective notice and lack of proper initiation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2020 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 532 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398413</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the penalty proceedings initiated under Section 271AAB due to defective notices issued under Section 274 r.w.s. 271AAB, which did not specify the charges and clauses under which the penalty was levied. The penalties sustained by the CIT(A) were deleted, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, as the Tribunal upheld the relief granted by the CIT(A) on the grounds of defective notice and lack of proper initiation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>