https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398401 The Tribunal granted the appeal under Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013, restoring the company's name in the register of companies. Despite the unintentional non-compliance due to a lack of professional expertise, the company's restoration was approved with conditions including filing pending documents, payment of costs, and publication of the restoration order. The Tribunal declined to direct removal of directors from the list of disqualified directors, retaining the Registrar's authority for further actions in case of violations. en-us Fri, 21 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Sep 2020 11:17:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398401 The Tribunal granted the appeal under Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013, restoring the company's name in the register of companies. Despite the unintentional non-compliance due to a lack of professional expertise, the company's restoration was approved with conditions including filing pending documents, payment of costs, and publication of the restoration order. The Tribunal declined to direct removal of directors from the list of disqualified directors, retaining the Registrar's authority for further actions in case of violations. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 21 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398401