<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1904 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290225</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the lower appellate authorities&#039; findings that the respondent&#039;s activities aligned with charitable objectives. The Court emphasized the unique nature of the respondent&#039;s services, its regulatory function, and its role as the national entity for domain name allocation. By comparing the respondent to established charitable organizations, the Court affirmed the validity of the lower authorities&#039; decisions. Consequently, the Court found no legal basis to intervene and upheld the relief granted to the respondent under Sections 2(15) and 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:43:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1904 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290225</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the lower appellate authorities&#039; findings that the respondent&#039;s activities aligned with charitable objectives. The Court emphasized the unique nature of the respondent&#039;s services, its regulatory function, and its role as the national entity for domain name allocation. By comparing the respondent to established charitable organizations, the Court affirmed the validity of the lower authorities&#039; decisions. Consequently, the Court found no legal basis to intervene and upheld the relief granted to the respondent under Sections 2(15) and 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>