<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1947 (4) TMI 20 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290205</link>
    <description>Under the Income-tax Act, 1922, the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s power under section 33(4) was construed broadly enough to permit it to set aside an assessment and direct the Income-tax Officer to resume proceedings from an earlier stage for further enquiry. The statutory scheme was read as showing that the Tribunal&#039;s appellate authority was not limited to affirming or rejecting the appeal, but was at least co-extensive with the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s powers under section 31(3), including the power to annul, set aside, and order fresh assessment. The question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 1947 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:44:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1947 (4) TMI 20 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290205</link>
      <description>Under the Income-tax Act, 1922, the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s power under section 33(4) was construed broadly enough to permit it to set aside an assessment and direct the Income-tax Officer to resume proceedings from an earlier stage for further enquiry. The statutory scheme was read as showing that the Tribunal&#039;s appellate authority was not limited to affirming or rejecting the appeal, but was at least co-extensive with the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s powers under section 31(3), including the power to annul, set aside, and order fresh assessment. The question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 1947 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>