<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 498 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398379</link>
    <description>The Respondent in the case was found to have profiteered by not passing on the benefit of a GST rate reduction on admission tickets to exhibition of cinematograph films. The Director-General of Anti-Profiteering determined that the Respondent increased ticket prices instead of reducing them in line with the tax rate decrease. As a result, the Respondent was directed to deposit the profiteered amount of Rs. 5,31,625/- with interest into the Central Consumer Welfare Fund and the Telangana State Consumer Welfare Fund within three months. Although a penalty could not be imposed retrospectively, the Respondent was instructed to comply with the order within the specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 498 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398379</link>
      <description>The Respondent in the case was found to have profiteered by not passing on the benefit of a GST rate reduction on admission tickets to exhibition of cinematograph films. The Director-General of Anti-Profiteering determined that the Respondent increased ticket prices instead of reducing them in line with the tax rate decrease. As a result, the Respondent was directed to deposit the profiteered amount of Rs. 5,31,625/- with interest into the Central Consumer Welfare Fund and the Telangana State Consumer Welfare Fund within three months. Although a penalty could not be imposed retrospectively, the Respondent was instructed to comply with the order within the specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>