https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23219 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking a mandamus for disposal of applications under section 220(6) of the Income-tax Act and to stay realization of demands. It found no legal basis for interference, noting the petitioner had obtained an ad interim order with a bank guarantee. The court concluded that the applications for stay were disposed of with reasons provided, and there was no perversity in the orders. The rule was discharged, interim orders vacated, and respondents allowed to enforce the bank guarantee without costs awarded. en-us Mon, 23 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:13:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23219 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking a mandamus for disposal of applications under section 220(6) of the Income-tax Act and to stay realization of demands. It found no legal basis for interference, noting the petitioner had obtained an ad interim order with a bank guarantee. The court concluded that the applications for stay were disposed of with reasons provided, and there was no perversity in the orders. The rule was discharged, interim orders vacated, and respondents allowed to enforce the bank guarantee without costs awarded. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 23 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23219