<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1723 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290189</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, concluding that the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 of the I.T. Act was legally flawed. The reassessment order was canceled as it constituted a change of opinion based on previously known facts. The appeal was allowed, rendering other grounds moot.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1723 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290189</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, concluding that the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 of the I.T. Act was legally flawed. The reassessment order was canceled as it constituted a change of opinion based on previously known facts. The appeal was allowed, rendering other grounds moot.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>