<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (12) TMI 23 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23215</link>
    <description>HC held that advances made by the non-resident assessee-company to a landlord, pursuant to agreements for acquiring factory premises on lease for its existing manufacturing and service business, were made wholly for business purposes. Since acquisition of leasehold premises is ordinarily not in the capital field, the loss arising on non-recovery of such advances constituted a business loss, not a capital loss. Consequently, the amount written off was allowable as a deduction in computing taxable income. The question was answered in the affirmative, and the Tribunal&#039;s disallowance was reversed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 15:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (12) TMI 23 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23215</link>
      <description>HC held that advances made by the non-resident assessee-company to a landlord, pursuant to agreements for acquiring factory premises on lease for its existing manufacturing and service business, were made wholly for business purposes. Since acquisition of leasehold premises is ordinarily not in the capital field, the loss arising on non-recovery of such advances constituted a business loss, not a capital loss. Consequently, the amount written off was allowable as a deduction in computing taxable income. The question was answered in the affirmative, and the Tribunal&#039;s disallowance was reversed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>