<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 468 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398349</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondents to refund the IGST/ITC amount to the petitioner in compliance with a previous order within four weeks. Despite nine months passing with no action taken, the court issued notice to the respondents and directed further service to unserved respondents through counsel. The order was to be uploaded on the website and sent to counsel via email.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 468 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398349</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondents to refund the IGST/ITC amount to the petitioner in compliance with a previous order within four weeks. Despite nine months passing with no action taken, the court issued notice to the respondents and directed further service to unserved respondents through counsel. The order was to be uploaded on the website and sent to counsel via email.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>