<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 438 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398319</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition seeking initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, due to the genuine pre-existing dispute between the parties regarding the outstanding balance. The Tribunal found the dispute was raised before the Demand Notice and noted discrepancies in the invoices and ongoing legal proceedings between the operational creditor and the corporate debtor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2020 14:17:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 438 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398319</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition seeking initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, due to the genuine pre-existing dispute between the parties regarding the outstanding balance. The Tribunal found the dispute was raised before the Demand Notice and noted discrepancies in the invoices and ongoing legal proceedings between the operational creditor and the corporate debtor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>