<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (3) TMI 18 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23210</link>
    <description>Transfer of an entire income-earning business apparatus for inadequate consideration can fall within the deeming provision of the Gift-tax Act, 1958, even where the arrangement is styled as a fixed-term licence or permission; the transfer was treated as a deemed gift. A partnership firm is an assessable entity under the Act because the statutory definition of &quot;person&quot; is broad enough to include collective units. Exemption under section 5(1)(xiv) was unavailable because the transfer was not shown to be bona fide for facilitating the donor&#039;s business. The Tribunal&#039;s reduced valuation was upheld under the statutory method for non-revocable transfers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:12:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (3) TMI 18 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23210</link>
      <description>Transfer of an entire income-earning business apparatus for inadequate consideration can fall within the deeming provision of the Gift-tax Act, 1958, even where the arrangement is styled as a fixed-term licence or permission; the transfer was treated as a deemed gift. A partnership firm is an assessable entity under the Act because the statutory definition of &quot;person&quot; is broad enough to include collective units. Exemption under section 5(1)(xiv) was unavailable because the transfer was not shown to be bona fide for facilitating the donor&#039;s business. The Tribunal&#039;s reduced valuation was upheld under the statutory method for non-revocable transfers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>