<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1921 (7) TMI 3 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290187</link>
    <description>A bona fide declaratory suit by a presumptive reversioner challenging a Hindu widow&#039;s alienation is treated as a representative suit for the protection of the reversionary estate. A fully contested decree in such litigation binds the widow, the alienee and the entire reversionary body under Explanation VI to Section 11 CPC, so the transferee cannot later reopen legal necessity against the actual reversioner. The article also states that Section 79 of the Agra Tenancy Act applies only to a tenant unlawfully ejected from agricultural holding; pure grove land is outside that definition, so civil court jurisdiction remains available and the special six-month revenue remedy does not govern.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 1921 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2020 11:44:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1921 (7) TMI 3 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290187</link>
      <description>A bona fide declaratory suit by a presumptive reversioner challenging a Hindu widow&#039;s alienation is treated as a representative suit for the protection of the reversionary estate. A fully contested decree in such litigation binds the widow, the alienee and the entire reversionary body under Explanation VI to Section 11 CPC, so the transferee cannot later reopen legal necessity against the actual reversioner. The article also states that Section 79 of the Agra Tenancy Act applies only to a tenant unlawfully ejected from agricultural holding; pure grove land is outside that definition, so civil court jurisdiction remains available and the special six-month revenue remedy does not govern.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 1921 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>