<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 422 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398303</link>
    <description>The court declared Section 25(4) of the Customs Act, 1962, as amended by the Finance Act, 2016, unconstitutional. It also ruled that Notification No. 29/2018-Cus dated 1st March 2018 was effective only from 6th March 2018, the date of its electronic publication. Consequently, the court ordered the refund of excess customs duty and IGST collected from the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 422 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398303</link>
      <description>The court declared Section 25(4) of the Customs Act, 1962, as amended by the Finance Act, 2016, unconstitutional. It also ruled that Notification No. 29/2018-Cus dated 1st March 2018 was effective only from 6th March 2018, the date of its electronic publication. Consequently, the court ordered the refund of excess customs duty and IGST collected from the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>