<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 410 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398291</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT-A&#039;s decision to sustain a 12.5% disallowance on account of bogus purchases, rejecting the revenue&#039;s appeal for a hundred percent addition. Additionally, the ITAT disallowed the addition under section 43B for service tax based on precedent, while confirming the addition for outstanding VAT due to lack of explanation from the appellant. As a result, the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=622024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 410 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398291</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT-A&#039;s decision to sustain a 12.5% disallowance on account of bogus purchases, rejecting the revenue&#039;s appeal for a hundred percent addition. Additionally, the ITAT disallowed the addition under section 43B for service tax based on precedent, while confirming the addition for outstanding VAT due to lack of explanation from the appellant. As a result, the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>