https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290165 The limitation law in force on the date of the application governed a mortgagee's request for a personal decree under Order XXXIV, Rule 6 CPC because statutes of limitation are generally procedural and apply to pending or future applications unless they extinguish a vested substantive right. The court held that the Limitation Act, 1908 applied to the application, and the earlier remedy was not protected as a substantive right on these facts because the applicant still had a real opportunity to proceed under the new law. The application was therefore barred by limitation and dismissed. en-us Wed, 06 Feb 1929 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:49:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290165 The limitation law in force on the date of the application governed a mortgagee's request for a personal decree under Order XXXIV, Rule 6 CPC because statutes of limitation are generally procedural and apply to pending or future applications unless they extinguish a vested substantive right. The court held that the Limitation Act, 1908 applied to the application, and the earlier remedy was not protected as a substantive right on these facts because the applicant still had a real opportunity to proceed under the new law. The application was therefore barred by limitation and dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Feb 1929 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290165